> Some AC can go ridiculously low (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/3144803.stm).

Did you just post a link to a 23 year old news article with no sources on an http-only site as supporting evidence that your airbnb unit's AC unit can go dangerously low?

You really think your guests will get frostbite if you don't do them the favor of limiting the AC temperature (with the unintended side-effect of saving you some money)?

Folks, your blog post sucks at marketing.

Edit: your marketing site actually has excellent marketing information.

Edit #2: They've since replaced the blog post with a link to the marketing page. Good reaction time.

This is almost reaching Kubrick’s joke about wanting to film the fake moon landing on location.

> Be kind. Don't be snarky. Converse curiously; don't cross-examine. Edit out swipes.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

If twitter and reddit have demonstrated anything is that the fun people are having with image generation is not healthy.

How so? I don't have twitter or reddit, what are people doing?

If my social circle (in real life) is anything to go by, mostly testing out home renovation/decoration ideas.

That's also what my real life social circle does. My friends and family test out home reno/decoration ideas, and as I posted in another comment, my wife likes to visualize different layouts and changes to her flower gardens.

I make my brother look older and plumper in most pics he sends me. It makes me laugh.

Yep, renovation and landscaping idea mostly.

Well, that and infographics on what to do when the AI's start to take over.

Those monsters

I don't have twitter or reddit either, I've just seen what people post online

Well what are they posting that concerns you? That's what I'm wondering.

not that i have a problem with any of these, but i believe he’s talking about anime titties, futas, lolis, etc. and their more realistic variants

Ah okay, I was thinking stuff like political propaganda or something, but I think yours makes more sense.

Some times it's okay to mean it.

This is not one of those times.

Actually they are taking one from Anthropic's playbook and saying it's the user's fault for misunderstanding what "sharing" means.

It's all about trade-offs, do you want a bunch of extensions of varying quality from a bunch of developers, or do you want a bunch of extensions of varying quality from one developer?

Or the third path: use Pi to customize Pi. It’s pretty fast and easy, and now it does exactly what you want.

That's just "a bunch of extensions of varying quality from one developer" with extra steps

I wish I could see it with fresh eyes without the accumulated knowledge I have of how AI looks. What does this video look like to a person clueless about AI?

What do they think of the constant repetition of slow panning shows where barely anything is happening, or a guy spinning on the floor but his head morphs into his feet and his feet morph into his head, or a person kissing a mirror that isn't quite mirroring the person and it slowly becomes a person kissing what appears to be their identical twin standing on the other side a floating empty mirror frame?

I understood it more in the line of preventing a company from naming itself "Low sugar" and then blocking other companies from adding the words "Low sugar" to their packaging. Same thing with OpenAI, another company should be free to create an AI that's fully open and tag it as "Open AI" without fearing legal problems with OpenAI.