Have you thought about / are you big enough to buy that vendor?

Otherwise: Find a really good HandsOn CTO, give them enough budget to build up a team and have freelancers, build it out.

But before that, have good people analyse the business requirements first.

He wrote it from his perspective.

come on...

He says "a teen". It's just incorrect grammar. He could have said 'his or her heart' or 'their heart', but not every teen is a 'he'.

Interestingly, when I was in school, we were taught that "he" could be used both for male or for gender-neutral usages.

The shift to treating he/him/his as exclusively male seems to be a fairly recent phenomenon (last few decades) as American social progressives sought to change language to be explicitly-inclusive instead of implicitly-inclusive and to avoid confusion due to the context-dependent dual meaning of such words.

1970s - "he" means everyone 1990s - "he/she" means everyone 2020s - "they" means everyone

Explicitly exclusive is another way of saying implicitly inclusive.

Kind of a wild take to ignore centuries of implicit and explicit exclusion of women from having civil rights.

this is also occurring in a tonne of european languages: german, french, spanish, italian, etc. it's progressives and people who care for others, not just americans.

as is well studies, we know very concretely how language and word usage influences thought (because it is thought, expressed)

Still entirely possible it’s from his perspective.

They were leader for over 10-15 years. They wiped the floor with Nehalem left and right.

The tooling of intel is still better than AMD.

The celerons and other types of CPUs are in plenty of notebooks people have who buy laptops below 1k.

The SSD topic happened, and went away i guess it was a margen topic. Low margin, ultra mass product lots of other companies happily building them.

I think its critical for intel to have knowledge about GPUs for a stable longterm strategy. It was critical 10 years ago when they tried and failed hard with larrabee but they need to do that or buy AMD/Nvidia. With AI and modern workload you can't just have CPUs anymore and with CUDA and ML that was clear a long time ago.

The market itself is also totally bonkers. When AMD surpassed intel, intel still sold like cake and still does. The fab capacity in the world is limited. If you can't get an Nvidia GPU for 200-300 because they complelty ignore this price range, than you have only AMD and intel left.

Intel took the market of low end gpus already through their iGPUs.

Intel knows how to build GPUs and other things than CPUs. It would be a total waste for them to stop.

Intel should have bought nvidia or done something else but the Intel CEO is an idiot. He stated publicly that Nvidias position is just luck. That is such a weird idiotic take its bonkers that someone who would say something like this is the CEO of intel.

The amount of R&D Nvidia did and still does left and right is crazy. He totally ignores how much Nvidia was doing the right things at the right time.

Not sure were intel is heading but with their fab knowledge and capacity, their cashflow and core tech, they should be able to swing back. I was hoping that would happen already, unclear to me why they struggle so so hard

JS isn’t any more or less broken than every other language under the sun

PHP has a lot of issues in comparision to java and other languages.

JS has also missing features and semantic which got added through typescript.

I don't want to dismiss langauges because of this but saying 'every other language' is not true and not true in an objective sense either.

It is not like gold...

I can hold gold. I can exchange it in a post war economy without internet. the industry actually consumes gold.

The deflationary by design is a fallacy.

It will lead to old investors becoming richer and richer but also for new investors to stop investing because the spread is going to become to big.

And deflationary by design doesn't protect bitcoin by collapsing and it will happen alone through the reward halfing in no time.

Bitcoin is deflationary in the sense that the supply is fixed at 21 million. And because people also loose access to their Bitcoin wallet, the actual supply will slowly decrease.

That's just a fact of how technology works. It's better phrased as "supply of Bitcoin is fixed".

As to your other arguments: I don't really get the connecting logic or even the point your making.

What is the "spread" that will stop new people from buying Bitcoin?

Can you explain the "Tom got very rich on Bitcoin and therefore I won't buy it today even though the price goes up because reasons..." logic?

Also what does reward halving have to do with the price of Bitcoin? The mining business will eventually end but as long as Bitcoin price goes 2x by each halving, the mining is is just as profitable.

Of course Bitcoin price can collapse. It already did a couple of times. But it also recovered and then some each time.

Given that prices of anything are driven by supply and demand, supply is fixed, the only question worth asking about Bitcoin is: will the demand go up? If demand goes up, the price goes up. And vice versa.

Bitcoin supply is fixed, the denominator is not.

If i invested into bitcoin 10 years ago, my $1000 are now worth (i don't want to calculate it) like $1000000.

So if someone else now wants to invest into bitcoin today, they have to accept that the old people have a tremendes financial advantage to this. The spread is a lot.

And no its not the same as investing into a company.

This will lead to rich people not investing into bitcoins because their return value is getting smaller and smaller.

Because the new bitcoin numbers are getting less and less through halfing, this effect gets stronger and stronger.

Bitcoin is hard limited on how much bitcoin exists while the normal fiat world creates new money based on humans and work capacity we have through a complex system. Bitcoin has not solved this problem. You can't lent bitcoins, create value and return this amount as an addition to the whole amount of bitcoins to represent this value.

The supply is not fixed, it reduces every day when people lose their keys, hence its deflationary

Sure if we want to account for that, but that makes the effect, i mentioned, even stronger and faster.

You can also combine two images and flip them in a gif constantly to see it in 3d.

Makes it a lot more accessable on the internet too :)

I don't think a co-founder would just jump ship just because. That would be very un-co-founderish.

I would also assume that he earns enough money to be rich. You are not a co-founder of OpenAI if you are not playing with the big boys.

So he definitly wants to be in this AI future but not with OpenAI. So i would argue it has to do with something which is important to him so important that the others disagree with him.

I'm betting on fully integrated agents.

And for good agents you need a lot of crucial integrations like email, banking etc. that can only provide companies like Google, Microsoft, Apple etc.

Anyone knows if re-ordering also helps here?

If i can sort the lines of the matrix, which is probably defined by how the token embedding is setup, i could potentially zero out weights which do not contribute at all and have areas of zeros i could mark and skip?