Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | RRRA's commentslogin

Oui, j'ai hâte que l'on partage d'avantage avec l'Europe que les É-U...

Bonjour du Québec.


Je suis tellement heureux de constater que Carney bouge rapidement.

Au début des annonces des tarifs, plusieurs experts disaient que de se découpler des américains étaient impossible à court terme. Nos économies sont trop entrelacées pour changer de cap rapidement.

Je ne sais pas exactement ce que Carney a en tête , mais j’espère que ça va accélérer le découplage.


Il a écrit un livre dans lequel il aborde ce qu'il a dans la tête.

C'est une bonne interview:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1g0nLGZIzhc (Anglais, désolé)

Mais les cas les plus extrêmes en Amérique sont relativement récents...


Salut ben fort d'Autriche ! On joue tous ensemble. Cheers to closer ties, Freunde.

When is this turned into an RFC?

I'm currently toying with a similar process which I think falls under the interoperability exemption:

- Get an apk online, you haven't accepted a EULA.

- Run jadx to get some code to work with

- Ask Claude to extract the protocol specification cleanly for a Bluetooth device with capabilities etc.

- Use Claude to implement a version as a TUI/CLI in go, rust, whatever.

I get to use a device I own with a local Bluetooth connection from my machine, maybe Home Assistant. I do not contact any online services (there are none anyway in that case).

Since it's to avoid getting locked in with proprietary OS, it's a clean room reversing through a spec and an LLM produced a non copyrightable output... Can I just release this however I want? Probably a basic MIT or CC0, whatever...


decompiling the apk is where you might trip up against DMCA etc. I've been doing this exact same thing with great success, if there's a mobile app you have the keys to unlock any bluetooth device (and maybe turn it into a Home Assistant component while you're at it).

So has the spec been built with a bluetooth capture dongle, would it be better?

That said, I'm in Canada which has some different nuances around the same exemption and IANAL


It'd be nice if it could use a mic to self calibrate according to a target response profile curve.


I think that unlike Meshtastic or Meshcore, this one is transport agnostic.


Exactly, it's making connection across vast set, not bringing the magic intuition.

Has anyone tried feeding all of human knowledge to an LLM prior to Einstein's work and tried to have it reinvent physics?


Where would you get enough pre internet tokens to train a near-frontier model?


Pretty sure it's been the year of the Linux desktop for 30 years for me...


In Montréal we've rebooted Réseau Libre which used to be a Wi-Fi mesh experiment 15+ years ago. It's a fun experiment, but in a way feels like a step backward for me. Meshtastic and Meshcore are just that, messaging, but that makes it the standardized killer app. On the other side you have reticulum which allows decoupling from the LoRa low bandwidth only radios, seems to do a lot of neat stuff, but if we're reinventing a whole network layer, we're going to have to reinvent services, discovery, etc. and I fear we're wasting time when in the end what wins is controlling the backbone bandwidth, but with the added difficulty of a p2p mesh.

I'm starting to feel this is a fun activity, but realistically copium for a world that is very sadly centralizing everything.


I have difficulty following you.

> a Wi-Fi mesh experiment 15+ years ago. It's a fun experiment, but in a way feels like a step backward for me.

Why? WiFi technology is cheap and available. Seems like a great basis for a mesh.

> Meshtastic and Meshcore are just that, messaging, but that makes it the standardized killer app.

Why "just"? All the internet protocols are also just messaging at the end of the day - request: A sends message to B, response: B sends message to A.

> On the other side you have reticulum which allows decoupling from the LoRa low bandwidth only radios, seems to do a lot of neat stuff

I'm not familiar with Reticulum (neither with Mesh* in any meaningful way) - do you mean to say that Reticulum is more flexible regarding the radio technology - as in: no need to by specific devices like for Meshcore?

> I'm starting to feel this is a fun activity, but realistically copium for a world that is very sadly centralizing everything.

Can't say I disagree, sadly.


Oh yes, Wi-Fi was cheap, but before HaLow we ended giving up because we couldn't get a meaningful density for the network to get far enough across town to start to be remotely useful, even with 10-15dBi antennas mounted outside.

About the messaging aspect, I mean that though a messaging app is great, I feel that the end goal is having an independent network from the telcos, carriers, etc. In that sense we're going to need to allow more than an SMS replacement.

And from there is born the problem. Bootstraping such a network for more than geeks is relatively impossible in that context. You either have a device that does one thing as a drop-in magic solution for newcomers to jump on, or you chase the better solution, but that brings as much complexity, if not more, as running the Internet...

And while I'm happy to see p2p and mesh research continuing, participate when I can, I just feel like it's a pipe dream that is far far away and I'd like to see it grow beyond the few dozens of decentralization geeks in every city :)


Now rebrand it the Apple car, and somehow it would makes sense...


Surprised Enlightenment didn't make the cut while fvwm is there


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: