And what's with that bs cookie banner?
If the only cookies are functional/essential, they don't need to show a cookie banner.
If it's for analytics, then I should be able to reject it.
Otherwise, it's just a dick-over.
What? It only stays enabled for exactly 1 hour after the 24 hour timer?
I was under the impression that it would stay enabled permanently after waiting the 24 hours once.
IIRC, it's the button to permanently activate it that is only available for one hour. Once you do manage to press it, you've permanently enabled it. If you miss the window, you have to start the 24 hours again.
One is kinda half hidden behind a tree on the far right and another one is next to the starting sign. The rest are on the beach area and very slightly off the beach area
It's a perfectly not reasonable cookie banner. If you click on Details, you can see that they're not using marketing, statistics, or any other kind of cookies apart from the technically necessary. Which is great, but also means that they don't even need a banner. It could just go away.
Moral implications of LLM aside, this is an always-online, subscription-based toy that will eventually turn into a brick (unless the parent is an HN-er).
I find it really sad that this kind of toy is sold in stores.
This is up there with "Easy-Bake Oven" among plastic doodads that will be used for ~40 minutes and then added to a pile of plastic garbage many adults keep in their basement.
I don't oppose to the open backend of the device (it should be table-stakes for this kinda thing), but the concept seems really zero-sum and disposable. It relies on a form-factor that most kids don't use and depends on the novelty of AI which will wear off pretty fast. As much as I hate to say it, this should have been an app or a website.
reply