Talk about exaggeration.

How so?

We will see how spectacularly it will fail. But hey at least some young blood, they will probably try honestly.

Maybe for the first two weeks.

And then there’ll be the inevitable “I have to work with that person for how long!?” And the fiefdoms will be set up, and the back stabbing will begin.

That’s before we even consider the effect of the unelected bureaucracy and the power of the lobby groups and foreign interests.

This site is impossible to read because of the invasive ads.

In 1930s.

still waiting and my popcorn is spoiled already

To witness the joy of his professional demise?

To witness the implosion of openai

It is for sure that Patent and copyright laws did more harm than good for humanity. For an intereseting debate on this [video]: https://youtu.be/Ep2-ohgFOys?si=BsE9rQyORdElJtb6

Why amazed? People bypass captcahs for a long time. Llm using those tools is meh.

I guess he is not yearning for dictatorship, the style of censorship is the question. Preventing access to information is bad, but likely less harmful than deception.

> Preventing access to information is bad, but likely less harmful than deception.

It’s a mistake to separate these. They go hand in hand and mich further as you climb up the authoritarian ladder.

What do you think is the style of censorship in authoritarian regimes like Iran? Do you think it’s just preventing access?

It is a shame OP's comment is flagged. Talk about censorship