Why does this whole thread sound like OpenAI marketing department is participating ? Ive been talking to google assistant for years. I really don't find anything that magical or special.

As a Tesla owner, for me Autopilot refers to highway / freeway driver assistance and Full Self Driving ( Supervised ) is for local streets. The only thing FSD provided previously was auto lane changing.

What the hell is with their naming? Self Driving sounds like an absolute and then they add the Full specifier to really drive it home but also add (supervised) meaning you must supervise the super duper full self driving.

>Even the brand name “Autopilot” is misleading, NHTSA said, conjuring up the idea that drivers are not in control.

Ironic how the Verge forms a union of Autopilot and FSD crashes in their headline to further convolute the major differences. As much as we blame Elon for naming Full Self Driving, I also think the media is responsible for tacking all Tesla modes together to get clicks.

The NHTSA report looks at both

I'm a little confused. Doesn't the user still have to sign into each oauth service individually still ?

1. So is this managing tokens ?

2. These templates are used instead of api's ?

I still speculate PG's golden boy was fired for unethically sourced training data for gpt 4 but we'll likely never get the real story.

Any status of the human that caught the "Texas Flu"

so sell it to another country, then Russia and China buys from them. Sounds pointless

Like any propaganda, it is not pointless. You _must_ underestand than _only_ those countries will use the data to do harm. FAANG will only use the data to improve their services. /s

This has nothing to do with all the other nonsense.

Pass Data Privacy laws and enforce them.

They want their domestic companies to be able to freely sell data, that is the whole point of their long dance to avoid data protection laws. They would otherwise have already taken inspiration from 150+ countries who have proper data protection law (yes, contrary to popular beliefs, it is not just EU that has a proper data protection framework).

xenophobic nonsense.

You've been breaking the site guidelines a lot lately. Can you please not? I recognize that you're representing a minority point of view and I know how frustrating that can be (believe me, I know). But if you keep breaking the site guidelines, we can't suspend moderation because of that.

Also, it's not in your interest to do this because it makes your comments less persuasive and indeed gives people an easy reason to dismiss them. So if you'd please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and stick to the rules when posting here, we'd appreciate it.

Past explanations here in case helpful: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...

Also, in case it's helpful, here is a list of moderation posts I made for a user who was in a similar position a while back: https://news.ycombinator.com/chinamod. It's old(ish) now but the principles are all still the same.

explain to me how this isn't all xenophobic ? If any of this was real or legit all users would be clamoring for data privacy laws, not a forced sale of some fake boogey man bs.

If you're a mod then please why are you allowing for this. Half this xenophobic speach and anti chinese rhetoric is worse than calling it out.

(I'm a mod, yes.) I'm not defending anyone else's bad comments. I'm saying we need you to follow the rules, regardless of how bad other comments are or you feel they are. The same goes for everyone.

I've put in countless hours, over the years, trying to do just what you're demanding here. That's why I gave you that last link to look at. We've learned the hard way that there are limits to what moderators can do about this, unfortunately—and when you post comments that are egregiously breaking the site guidelines, you make this problem harder.

Just to be clear, I don't want you to stop posting! I'm saying we need you to make your substantive points thoughtfully, in keeping with the HN guidelines. I realize how hard that is when feeling the pressure of being outnumbered by an ignorant majority. But if you post things like "you sound as ridiculous as the politicians", "jfc the absolute garbage rhetoric", and so on, you make it impossible for the mods to do much about the comments on the other side—people will simply point to your posts and say "but it's ok for them to break the rules?"

We cut people slack for being under the pressure of holding a minority view in an argument, but there's a limit to how far we can take that, and your comments are unfortunately beyond that limit. That's why I responded to you, in the hope of persuading you to understand this dynamic. I have a lot of sympathy for your position—not because I agree or disagree about the underlying topic, but because I know what it feels like to be outnumbered on the internet.

i appreciate your response.

I remember when HN was actually intelligent conversation without the political nonsense. you should be ashamed

This perception has been around almost as long as HN itself has: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17014869.

Lets not be Naive and think that the massive data collection of FB data isn't available because of their methods. Cambridge Analytica proved the possibilities.

This has less to do with data, and more about xenophobia.

Create data privacy laws is the only way to protect the US