Not really. They can get RAM just fine, and delay upgrade/refresh cycles to stretch existing component lifecycle, which was already very long if they needed to.
They can get RAM at drastically more expensive rates. And not all critical applications have unlimited budgets to absorb the increase. It’s the reverse Jevon’s paradox.
Yes. Convince me why your site is worth my attention, don't try to force it through a dark pattern and then try to justify why I should waste my time figuring it out.
> Honest note: Anthropic has not shipped a public Claude watermark detector yet. This tool uses rewrite-based neutralization — a meaning-preserving paraphrase with a non-Claude model — which is the attack path watermark research points to. Not affiliated with Anthropic.
Well, they should have run their own AI slop website through their tool...
This attack was actually pointed out in the watermarking paper linked above. The researchers added an instruction to the prompt that switches letters like a Caesar Cipher. It lowers the quality of the output from the LLM but alters the "red list" enough for a watermark detection tool to fail at detecting the watermark.
What on earth LLM are you using and do you tell it which distro/version of Linux they are supposed to be working with + give them access to web search or man pages? I haven't had this issue in like a year and a half.
By default I use Leo, and I do specify the distro. I tried to qualify by version, but when I do that I lose out on a lot of correct information for things that haven't changed in awhile.
Leo is not even the LLM, its just a browser extension typically running a very weak/cheap model. Why not use claude code so it knows your system without relying on you to give it accurate info? I guarantee your results will be night and day
Well, on the plus side, SoundCore (Anker) are at least reputable enough (even though security teams would still want to review that!):
Under the security part, they do seem to at least be compliant with your typical security standards (HIPAA, SOC 2 Type 1, etc.) and claim that all data is deleted within 12 hours of transcription. So it isn't like the contents of your meeting are being siphoned off to some fly-by-night service, at least.
The one thing I know Anker for is that they were uploading the feeds of their doorbell cameras without encryption (even though they claimed e2ee), and iirc they were also uploading thumbnails of these cameras to a publicly accessible S3 bucket, and consistently lying about it all.
So no, I don't think they're very reputable at all.
I moreso meant the quality of their hardware, though that's fair, I didn't recall that. Still, if they are bothering to go to the effort of getting audited (granted, I don't like reading audit reports so I didn't look at who actually performed them) - it seems like they are actually trying, as opposed to what you might expect from a less scrupulous company, where it's more like the wild west.
I love these little anecdotes on HN, they are like a little dessert post-main-post. Thanks for sharing :-) what an incredible thing to have had the scoop on!
I have had Claude and Codex look at third party repositories on several occasions as reference material for something I wanted to make my own version of, and not once have they ever cloned it unless I told them to. Sometimes I would notice they would just keep reading the repo through a ton of API calls so I'd just stop them and clone it for them and tell them to look there. And not once was the output anywhere near that close to the original, plus they usually added attribution info if the results were even (unscientific estimate) 50-60% similar.
Medical != medicine. Physical therapists provide therapeutic interventions. Doctors of Medicine (M.D.) practice medicine. This is why they can prescribe medicine. Same with Doctors of Medicine in Dentistry (D.M.D., also known as Dentists).
Psychiatrists are also Doctors of Medicine and can prescribe medicine. Other mental health professionals (Licensed Professional Therapist, Licensed Marriage and Family Therapist, Psychologist) are not and provide therapeutic interventions.
EDIT: I just realized I'm coming at this from a USA-centric point of view. I have no idea how this applies to other places.
I'm sorry, but going to a quack doctor is not medical care, much like McDonald burgers would not be a healthy meal regardless of whether or not that's all you can afford.
Except at least in the McDonald's case you have to eat food to survive, so you may not have a choice. You don't have to go to a chiropractor to survive, so it's better to not go there at all than it is to go and receive possibly dangerous treatment from a con artist.
Remember, there is no science behind what they do. They don't know if they're going to hurt or paralyze you because they never went to medical school!!
It's not "probably not" doing anything, it's definitely not doing anything, because chiropractic is quack pseudoscience that has been thoroughly debunked and also has a bunch of other bizarre and fantastical elements to it beyond "cracking your back"
