Why not try to warn the owners first? Taking the site off of those lists is a pain.

How do you do that if the website has no contact details and WHOIS contact form gets no reaction?

Contacting the registered abuse contact (per the WHOIS data) is just step one. If that fails then, sure, go ahead and let the domain registry know that the contact method on their file is dead and then it makes sense to put the sites on a blocklist

Feels like they find critical vulnerabilities in GitLab almost weekly.

That's because they do, as well as in every other giant product, because security auditing has gotten quite a bit better.

If you host it yourself, an outage on your side might end up taking it offline too.

It's ready to connect in 2 seconds instead of 45.

I've been using KernelCare in my servers for many, many years now, and have yet to experience a single crash. One of them has been up for close to 4 years now.

I just use fallocate to create a 1GB or 2GB file, depending on the total storage size. It has saved me twice now. I had a nasty issue with a docker container log quickly filling up the 1GB space before I could even identify the problem, causing the shell to break down and commands to fail. After that, I started creating a 2GB file.

Interesting! I did `fallocate -l 1G myfile` - very fast. Its all zeros but probably won't be compressed by the filesystem since its created with the fallocate() system call.

I really don't get it. Wouldn't you be wasting a lot of resources feeding the bots like this?

Do they offer a subscription like Claude? These models waste so many tokens "thinking", that using via API is a complete waste of money.

At least Anthropic tells you how many more tokens you’re paying for! 5x 10x 20x whatever. Google seems to just say more, higher, highest.

The pricing page for Claude literally says "More usage" for the $17/month pro plan. Doesn't really quantify anything. The usage is whatever they feel like it should be.

And then the very expensive plan says "Choose 5x or 20x more usage than Pro". It's all arbitrary.

I think this ship has sailed.

which one?

If you let it, Claude Code will write a comment for almost every single line of code.

Even if you try to get them to not, they will still overcomment the code. Or at least overcomment it from the perspective of a human. From the perspective of the LLM, I suspect the comments are necessary for it to be able to get the code output correct.

It's also a discoverability tool. If the code has good docstrings and decent naming for functions/variables it's a lot easier for the LLM to find the correct places to edit.