Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | curiousnycips's commentslogin

In China, one negative remark about the government may get you a visit from the police and a stern talking-to. A history of such remarks may get you interrogated or fined. For extreme violators you may not be allowed on social media at all, and you may lose your job.

In America, one politically incorrect mark may get you not allowed on social media at all, right from the start. It may also lead to your immediate termination from your job, if your single remark attracts any attention whatsoever online. You may be de-platformed. You may be sued. Your bank may decide to close your account. And the people are angry. They want to punish thought criminals. If you think the Bad Thoughts, you deserve everything you have coming to you.

In China, the government is remote, people are generally happy with the job it's doing, and no one wants to criticize it. So the rule of "don't criticize the government" is not a burdensome one, and (aside from a few vocal minorities at the fringes of society) people don't care.

Yet in America, the smorgasbord of people and thoughts you are not permitted to criticize are around you 24/7. They are pushed continually in the media you consume (for "representation"), promoted as heroes and "brave", and if you disagree with any of this, at all, you had better hold your tongue about it.

One of these countries deeply and heavily oppresses its populace, with continual threats of job loss, social ostracization, and suspicion about whom around you might be an informant, a political extremist or opportunist who will report your Bad Thoughts on the nearest social media platform and seek your immediate and total ruination.

The other country does no such thing, and the idea that you would have to live in a state of perpetually policing your thoughts to not get fired or ostracized seems bizarre and paranoid when you relate it to its people.

I'll let you guess which country is which.

Source: 30 years in the U.S., 10 years in China. Frequent travel between the two, and tons of exposure to many people in both.


For this user, the first IP address we have on record (mid-November 2019) matches this user plus two other users.

The latest matching IP address for this user was yesterday (July 6th, matching this user and one other).


> The first step should've been looking up the hostnames to see what you're dealing with.

Great point.

After looking up 29 of the IP addresses, it seems 28 of them (including all the overlapping IP addresses) are T-Mobile.

Among the 29 I checked, there is 1 IP address with a different hostname (Verizon). This address is unique and not shared with any other users.

Presumably all these forum members based in New York City are all also T-Mobile customers there, it seems?

> It could be several things, but it's most likely either CGNAT, or you're using a CDN and these are their ranges.

We do, but it's configured to pass the user's origin IP to our site, rather than the CDN's IPs.


Geo IP for Verizon Wireless and T-Mobile are close to worthless; they effectively allocate from a nationwide pool.

If not more, hundreds of thousands of users share a single IP on T-Mobile, if you are talking about IPv4. They stopped handing out IPv4 a while ago. It's all v6 + CGNAT.

If it's web traffic and not arbitrary TCP TLS traffic, likely even more users share it as they cache web and run it through shared proxies.


Consider applying for YC's Winter 2027 batch! Applications are open till November 2.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: