Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | falloon's commentslogin

I was quite angry when they first announced that they weren't going to support Arc last year and refused to switch to their new 'AI-powered' Dia browser.

After a year to cool off, I gave Dia a shot. Despite wanting to hate it, I like the browser a lot. You can turn off the shit AI features, and it's a well designed and thoughtful UX.

As much as Josh is a tool, this is genuinely a great product and the team at TBC has executed really well.


That’s neat, but I don’t understand in what world I would migrate to a browser made by the people who just killed their browser after promising it would be maintained indefinitely. Especially after being bought by Atlassian, who has an almost perfect track record of ruining or sunsetting nearly every acquisition.


Makes me wonder what would have been if they had just continued on with Arc and implemented Dia features there, instead of flushing all that user goodwill down the toilet when they announced that Arc development was ending last year.


>As much as Josh is a tool

did you really have to include that? without substantiation this is just a mean offhand side swipe.


The substantiation is sunsetting a popular browser because you bought into AI hype. Hence, tool.


And your reply accomplishes what, exactly?


You're OK returning to the vendor that fucked you over with their last product and trusting that they won't do it again with their new product?


Pedantic cloud enjoyer here, the article should name this a pyrocumulus not pyrocumulonimbus - the nimbus part means 'rain-bearing' in meteorology, fire clouds don't rain.


Cumulonimbus has been separated from its etymological roots. It now refers to the physics that can produce deep convection, high clouds, and the formation of an anvil shape (along with lightning, etc). The convection that produces a cumulonimbus rain cloud is present in a pyrocumulonimbus cloud. The word isn't wrong.


Well, I was confidently wrong about that. I stand corrected, thanks for the pointers.


Comment threads like these are why I read HN comments.

Thank you for the insights, both of you.


People need to learn what compound words are.


Pyrocumulonimbus [1] appears to be the most extreme version of pyrocumulus [2] which, coincidentally, was observed halfway around the world in Washington State this week [3].

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cumulonimbus_flammagenitus

[2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flammagenitus_cloud

[3]: https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/climate-lab/little...


Incorrect. These fires basically create their own weather systems. All that smoke also contains a lot of water in the material that is burning. (That makes sense. They are trees, after all.) When the smoke reaches high enough in the atmosphere the smoke cools and water can precipitate out (rain) and also lightning potentially producing more fires.


To be fair, it's not the article that's the problem. Pyrocumulonimbus is the accepted scientific name: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cumulonimbus_flammagenitus.


Thanks for the article. However, the article mentions that they might involve precipitation.


Yes, they might. The grandparent comment of this thread in multiple different ways, not just the name.


The term used by the UK Royal Meteorological Society is pyrocumulonimbus: https://www.rmets.org/metmatters/pyrocumulonimbus-clouds


During the press conference describing this the speaker claims they’re working with meteorologists from France Météo supporting the term at 6:30 https://www.dailymotion.com/video/xas3lw2

Technical details in the video link start around 3:34 for those interested

Excuse the French for the non Francophones but trying to be detailed and exacting here on why this isn’t bad journalism to use that term


It rains ash. While it’s a metaphorical use of “rain” it’s physically accurate.


Apparently this cloud can create lightning and its own wind though


it rains hellfire


I'm something of a cloud-enjoyer. If you're interested in learning more about clouds I'd recommend the international cloud atlas website. https://cloudatlas.wmo.int/en/home.html

Personal top three clouds:

- Nacreous clouds

- Altocumulus lenticularis

- Cirrus homogenitus (what a name)


I'm something of a cloud enjoyer myself. See also https://cloudappreciationsociety.org/


I have visited this here and there for the past 20+ years.

https://www.cloudman.com


…and now I've learned something new today:

https://cloudatlas.wmo.int/en/fog-bow.html


Readme has a discord link claiming 25K online, might want to update that it's quite misleading.


Sorry, it happened because it was originally an OpenClaw fork.


If you were writing a promotional post for your new model, would you include benchmarks of a competitor that's spanking you across the board? This is marketing.


Ace step 1.5 is great, only 1.5b params so very easy to run locally.

https://github.com/ace-step/ACE-Step-1.5


I defer understanding FFMPEG arguments to the LLMs.


This is a great example of how to handle post incident communication.


All servers will have a single thunderbolt port.


Kiri engine is pretty easy to use and just released a good update for their 3DGS pipeline, and they have one of the better 3DGS to mesh options. https://kiri-innovation.github.io/3DGStoMesh2/


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: