Because "guilty until proven innocent" applies to courts. You can get fired from your job even without evidence that meets a specific legal threshold.
Moreover, he's already been proven to be both unethical enough and stupid enough to cheat on his wife with a foreign agent. That's not the kind of person that the board would want to run a multi-billion dollar company.
> presumption of innocence is general approach that morally must be applied everywhere
Nah. If a political candidate is accused by multiple credible sources of corruption, sexual assault, and embezzlement, would you withhold judgment until a court resolves the evidence (which will never happen) or just vote for someone else?
Even in countries with robust labor law, being bad at your job can lead to dismissal, and that strong deference about what constitutes being bad at your job is given to the employer.
> presumption of innocence is general approach that morally
That's really not true, and I don't think you genuinely believe this or act according to this belief. Let's say you have kids, and another parent tells you "hey, that guy asked my kid to get in a car with him, you should be careful", do you respond with "innocent until proven guilty! I will do no such thing!"
No, you will update your priors and tell your kid to stay the fuck away from that guy.
It's okay to express your thoughts and opinions, less so to be stating as hard fact to all what third parties will do ..
In my long experience, as a parent and a grandparent, my first reaction when hearing someone running another down is to take any accusations with a grain of salt and first consider the motivations of the source of rumour, gossip, accusations.
A surprising number of people do like to talk shit about others <shrug>.
They're a hardware company that made trillions of dollars selling hardware. "Commoditize your Compliment" is one of the oldest business strategies out there.
ultimately they are not going to win the AI model race. There's absolutely no way apple is thinking about making boatloads of money off whatever measly AI solution their team could come up with. Their best hope is to make their hardware platform attractive to AI researchers and businesses.
The platform is attractive to researchers and developers that that could potentially drive the future of adoption… Much like Nvidia’s current situation
A hardware company whose strongest gross margins come from services and has been trending in that direction for over a decade. Heck, if trends continue, their margins and profits might be predominantly services based in the not to distant future.
These are CPU-only times for the state management / style / layout / etc, but don't include rasterization (additional work in the benchmark harness required to measure GPU time sensibly), probably aren't fully apples-to-apples, and could probably do with testing some more complex layouts.
Why the snarky comment? We already have to data points: one person heard it was faster, another person heard it was slower. If more and more people tell what they've heard then we will know the truth. Please go read how science works!
If only the game I am surely going to develop some day would not waste 7% of the rendering budget on drawing the menu sliders! Must research all options now before I start. Must make an objective choice, so I need number that can be compared neutrally between frameworks. So, rendering performance it is.
I use a supervising agent, so if my sleeping agent has insomnia, the supervisor puts it back to sleep. It's helpful to have the supervisor put on relaxing music or read it something boring [1].
Even if they're parody (this one is), there are enough people now who take them seriously and put them into practice. I have never seen any other tech that surfaces that amount of idiocy.
reply