Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | jimberlage's commentslogin

This is probably not the primary way people use the tool, but if I log in (desktop, Chrome on macOS), click "Start a board" on the sidebar, and go to click any of the inputs, I can't type text in them (the inputs are "Start from an example", "What are you building", and "The brief".

If you scroll down they want you to "Connect copperhead to GitHub first." The bottom should have a page where you can give them access to a repo for handling stuff.

Am I understanding this right by thinking - if I was walking toward the black hole past the event horizon, and then I turned around, I would still be walking toward the black hole?


Once you pass the event horizon, every direction leads to the singularity in your future. Directions "away" from the singularity may still visibly show what things looked like outside of the event horizon before you fell in, but that is from your past. Heading in that direction will not get you back there anymore, you will only find the singularity along that path in your future.


> if I was walking toward the black hole past the event horizon, and then I turned around

Note that, once you're inside the horizon, you can't "turn around" and go back outside again. You're inside the hole for good.

And once you're inside the hole, yes, no matter which direction in space you move, you're moving "towards" the singularity. But a better way to look at it is that the singularity is a moment of time, not a place in space. You're moving "towards" the singularity in the same sense as you're moving "towards" next Tuesday. You can't stop moving towards next Tuesday by changing which direction in space you move. The same is true for the singularity once you're inside the hole's horizon.


You can't turn around though. Everything goes toward the black hole. If you turned around, atoms would be moving away from, or at the least changing their direction in respect to the black hole. And that's not possible. You wouldn't even see anything because all light is going toward the center, and it wouldn't go into your eyes.

Unless you went in butt-first, but the path of the photons would have changed and would now be going toward the black hole, and everything would look probably all smushed together.


Sounds like that would be true if you were inside any closed surface.


Not quite: inside a closed surface you can't escape, but things can repeat.

You can avoid a coordinate, for example by choosing not to go there, or revisit another one repeatedly.

A black hole on the other hand doesn't have that: you cannot revisit old locations - attempting to do so moves you closer to the singularity.


Unless it's a spinning black hole, which contains closed timelike curves that can be reached from and can escape back to the outside universe?


Kerr spacetime contains closed timelike curves inside the inner horizon. You can reach them from the outside universe, but you can't escape back out.

Also, the region inside the inner horizon of Kerr spacetime is widely considered to be not physically reasonable, not just because of the closed timelike curves, but because the inner horizon itself is unstable--there is an infinite blueshift there which, it is believed, would cause it to be destroyed by the first tiny bit of incoming matter or radiation.


None of those proposed time machines has ever turned out to be theoretically workable when the details are investigated more closely by physicists.

Why were pharmacies viable before? Presumably they didn't lose money for their whole history.


Most pharmacies are having financial issues basically due to being stuck in the middle of the battle between insurers, drug manufacturers, and PBMs over reimbursement rates, and having the weakest negotiating position of all of the parties.

AI probably will save the pharmacies some money, but IMO this will probably cause reimbursement rates to decline further, leaving the pharmacies in the same position as before.


Weakest negotiating position other than the customers.

The funny part is probably a majority of pharmacies are owned by CVS or Walgreens each of which are insurance companies in their own right, and often people with company health insurance will ONLY allow reimbursements through their company pharmacy.


Tbh, this is most industries. Very few have much of a moat and have some wedge/pressure from their suppliers (land/labor/capital), their clients and competition.

Insurance companies and PBMs would probably say the same they have competitors (ie:replaceable) and can’t just pay more for this or that, or reject any cost saving measure available.


https://www.healthaffairs.org/doi/abs/10.1377/hlthaff.2024.0...

Of the 88,930 retail pharmacies operating during 2010–20, 29.4 percent had closed by 2021.


and that was not due to answering phones .. adding a nondeterministic black box of bullshit will change nothing.


PBMs gained control of drug pricing and squeezed out the small pharmacies that don’t offer additional services like compounding.

CVS And Walgreens both own and operate PBMs. And UHG (Optum), 19 Blue Cross plans collectively own Prime Therapeutics, Kaiser owns one, the DVA has one, Express Scripts is owned by Cigna. There’s likely more I am unfamiliar with too.



The federal government could potentially oversee the most populous areas of the state and those near a military installation pretty easily. They don’t have to look at every one.


AI is great at reading, so give it things to read. Claude will try to throw big markdown docs in your repo, but you don't have to do that. Make it keep docs by the code.

I include a line in AGENTS.md that says "We *always* add docstrings to methods, classes, structs, and namespaces - there should be 100% coverage of docstrings."

It will make better choices about what functions to make or remove if you force it to justify why the function exists.

And when you have to go back and understand, it becomes easier.


It’s clear at this point that agents don’t actually follow agents.md

They try to but they don’t. As an example, we use perforce in games. I regularly have to stop an agent and remind it to use p4 edit rather than blasting through the read only flag, despite the first paragraph of Claude.md being “this is a project using perforce. Batch call p4 edit on all files before modifying, do not manually remove the read only flag”


You have to make or use just enough productivity tools not to fall behind, but otherwise it's a trap.

I used to check once a quarter. With AI, I devote 1-2 days a week to the meta-task of improving my tooling, but I'm sure that will fade once AI tooling becomes more standardized.

It's not worth being one of those guys who gets too into the tools, because it can keep you from the actual valuable work. Plus, you are then judged not as a regular engineer, but as a person who is supposed to have some secret productivity sauce, and when people see that it doesn't make more of a difference they can start to discount your opinion.


I first learned about endless scroll in a Ruby on Rails meetup, where the presenter was showing how to craft snippets of HTML with ERB and using a bit of JS to insert them below the existing entries. It's definitely possible.

Maintaining a code path with a snippet for each possible viewing experience, back when REST was all the rage, was a bit obnoxious though.


I think the problem with getting this done in the US is the lack of public transit and the dysfunction in public schools.

If you could avoid a $700 car payment and still get to school/job/grocery store on time, a lot of Americans would.

But if you can't, and you are paying $700 anyways, why not at least use the fact that you're paying $700/month to travel anywhere and get a bigger parcel of land all to yourself? There's a big incentive to have single-family homes for rent as long as that math is true.

And if you can live in a dense area and get around OK, but paying $700/month saves you from $800/month in private school payments, then the math might still make renting SFH better even if the transit is there.


No body is forced to have a $700 car payment. That's a luxury financing $30k+ on a brand new or nearly new car.


True (I certainly don't!) but I chose it because I had to do some research a while back and that was close to the average for Americans.

[1]: https://qz.com/average-car-payment-by-state#average-car-paym... [2]: https://www.lendingtree.com/auto/debt-statistics/


That's actually shocking. I've been in tech for 15+ years and have a good income. I've only recently purchased a new car instead of used, and with a monthly payment right by my state's average. Prior to this I never had a payment more than $250/mo.


Though with gas, maintenance, insurance on top of the car payment, that $700 is probably the floor of car ownership.


Those will vary vastly depending on where you live. Gas and insurance are high where I live, and even though the environment is harsh on cars (winters with salt), maintenance has never been much.


A counterpoint is that a huge number of suburban Americans already have experience with a condo association through being in an HOA.

Rural homeowners and people with single family homes in streetcar suburbs or cities don't, but most new developments already have an organization with dues for shared maintenance.


Most people don't see that as viable because American cities don't have the public transit needed to make that viable, and equally important, don't have condos built that are the size of a family home. And there's a big push among suburban parents to judge their kids for living in cities, even if they're not as dangerous as the parents think.

If we modeled Spain, we could have more condos. That would require good, safe transit, condos with green space and multiple rooms at a SFH price point, and a cultural change among the older generation to view cities as having less crime.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: