Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | osti's commentslogin

To be safe, just buy four and you'd be able to run the current biggest open weight models.

I think in Canada lobbying is much more limited, so it's probably not due to democracy that we get lobbying.


Yeah I know a principal engineer at AWS who's deaf. Every meeting there needs to be an interpreter present.


It's math, the result shouldn't be different just because it's a different sim.


Well if the fundamental constants or hidden variables of the universe are shifting because of his comment then it can change the outcome.


Depends how fundamental the variables are. If we can code a sim for a topos[1], why can’t we be in such a sim?

1. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1012.5647


unless mechanism behind our universe dynamically alters our logic on the fly to be artificially self-consistent


To be fair - there are statements in math that are independent of the axioms. For those statements, the universe you find yourself in can pick either version (true OR false) and still be consistent.

See also: noneuclidian geometry and axiom of choice.


Wait, wasn't there that strong stratego bot that came out from deepmind in 2022?


The article talks about that. The new bot required two orders of magnitude less training data and plays better.


Awesome, I will read this carefully later today. I'm always excited by AI research applied to games.



Google employees do.


Yup, this thing is basically useless. I just did /goal optimize the cuda kernel, and ai agent just proposed and tested a bunch of ideas by itself, and it profiled them using nsight ncu etc. by itself, which lead to one order of magnitude faster kernel.


You mean when they said they are doing safety evaluation and hardening? I'm having the same fear as you.


Yes, exactly.


It's an axiom that the modern Western mind is built upon.


The foundational failing I see in my countrymen is the notion that China can't innovate. Their economic reliance on exports is not untrue. Just like their reliance on energy imports is a fact (though one that we are seeing right now become more questionable.)

The average American will keep shouting over and over again that "China can't innovate" while they quietly and slowly tick off every box on their checklist of issues. It doesn't end well for us.


Do you have any numbers on the solve quality? Exploitability numbers etc.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: