Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | rl3's commentslogin

>> mouse study suggests

Probably the only thing preventing half this site from reaching for the scissors.


The consensus thus far appears to be that all modern TVs wipe their ass with user privacy.

Given what happened with games very recently, perhaps the question should be rephrased to: "Which modern TVs support flashing unsigned/self-signed firmware?"


>252 points by guitcastro 1 hour ago | 100 comments

This was trending #1, and now it's not even main page at #37.


ME2's ending was just terrible. The boss fight was ridiculously cheesy.

In contrast, ME1's ending may have well been a master class in game cinematography and writing.


The entirety of Mass Effect 1 was a master class in writing, from the opening cinematic to the ending credits, that more than made up for somewhat janky (though nevertheless entertaining) gameplay.


I think the Mass Effect games were very flashy but the gameplay elements were pretty shallow. It felt like all the dialog led to the same outcomes, you could be a paragon and give all the "good" replies to conversation or give all the edgy renegade replies and the story would proceed the same way. It kind of felt like it gave you the illusion of choice without actually giving you any real choice. I think it was endemic to the 2000's era RPG's Fallout 4 had exactly the same problem.

The combat wasn't very engaging either it was a boring feeling cover shooter. None of your character abilities or gear or anything seemed to have much of an effect.


Are there any games you like that you felt did give you a real significant choice in how the story played out?


Going back to the 90's the Original Fallout games (the Turn based ones) would give you different endings depending on the choices you made through out the game. Most recently Baldur's Gate 3.

Edit: Deus Ex series too


Ah we have the same taste in games :)

I originally asked because for most of the games I've played (and the ones you mention) the overall story played out the same regardless of your choices.

There could be branches and dialog changes but they always reconverged at important story points that stayed constant. And of course the cutscenes at very end would be different. Take DeusEx - some minor things would be different depending on your actions, and at the end you basically got to press a button to choose your ending.

The only real exception I can think of is Fallout New Vegas, where the game storyline would become wildly different as you chose to help different factions....that game was a rare exemplar of "choices matter".


Deus Ex which gives you three choices at the end?


Much of ME2's story is terrible (some of the side character stuff is delightful, but the 'main quest' is a train wreck).

My point was that ME3 was doomed because ME2 utterly failed at bridging the gap between the strong start of an epic that was ME1 and what should have been the conclusion in ME3.

In fact 'fail' may be generous. I don't think it even 'tried'.


"probing uranus" was so worth it tho


I always thought this was a hot take but I agree!


>YC loves domestic spying.

Now the submission has been flagged off the main page. Imagine that.


The specific clearance requirement may suggest Section 702/FISA capability being employed.

If that ends up being the case, then you're talking a reality where American citizens become the target of warrantless domestic surveillance, using data collected by the NSA. Every phone call, e-mail, text message, DM, group chat; anything a person has ever said or done in their digital lives going back years.

It's worse now with AI, because human effort is no longer required to read intercept transcripts or conversations. Instantaneous surfacing of dirt/leverage.


Warrantless surveillance already exists in the US for monitoring cleared people and those with adjacency. The third party doctrine covers everyone else. Everything you can imagine them doing is being done. They already have the collection methods running and just need authorization to expand the scope.


This would be illegal of course.


That doesn't generally seem to be an impediment to the US gov.


When the courts have no power or are complicit then legality is irrelevant.


I mean, so is murdering people in cold blood, that's why ICE doesn't really do that.


>I'm told we're living in the future, but it sure doesn't feel like it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vzm6pvHPSGo


I give it a 50/50 that they're drowning under the weight of their own slop half the time.

That said, getting a frontier model self-improvement harness to work correctly end-to-end isn't trivial.


Nice project name.


thank you


The formal term for sloptelligence.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: