Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | swe_dima's commentslogin

I was really hoping they would change their mind about the increased pricing for Gemini 3.8 starting new year, but apparently it's set now

Temporary workaround is to do

git config --global url."https://github.com/".insteadOf git@github.com:

so it pushes / pulls using HTTPS

when things are back to normal run:

git config --global --unset url."https://github.com/".insteadOf


Incidentally, I couldn't create N4 SQL instances in several Google Cloud regions for several weeks now due to Google not having capacity...


Now make an agent interact with it and make it lose its mind


Sadly if cloud providers don't offer it on managed postgres then not many people can use it...


Well you can always move to tiger cloud if you want it managed :) And this is PostgreSQL licensed just like our pg_textsearch which has been adopted to Googles AlloyDB and microsofts HorizonDB already, so there is hope!


I still much, much prefer the page router. The caching model is much simpler. Shame that they hired all the open source react maintainers and now nothing other than Tan stack gets developed.


Same here.


Would love to see benchmarks on visual tasks.


UPS is also full of holes. No verifications whatsoever.

You can purchase a label from a reseller and then ship using that label to a different place at a different weight several times. Battled with this at a previous job.


>UPS is also full of holes. No verifications whatsoever.

I've had one of my UPS account numbers used to purchase some labels for someone else (I have no idea who). No way to report this to UPS since I can no longer get in touch with my account rep (who was great, until he disappeared).


Same. One of my UPS accounts would up with about $300 of shipping charges for things that were very clearly not to or from me. Impossible to get ahold of anyone at UPS to discuss/dispute this. Just wound up creating a new account.


This article is about USPS.


That's why they said "also"


Was considering buying ads on ChatGPT. A damning thing is that yours audience then are users too cheap to buy a sub...


That's a problem with most unsolicited online advertising. Are YouTube ad-watchers any more likely to splurge on your SaaS?


It's slightly different though, considering a lot of ad spend is for B2B products/services, and a lot of work pay for ChatGPT, so its only people who's work won't pay for a pro subscription.

Whereas, YouTube is for personal consumption in almost all cases, doesn't say anything about your employers willingness to invest in software/services


Just like mobile apps, subs will never come close to the growth expectation. Given trillions are tied up in AI, subs aren't going to do it.


does this mean RAM prices can go down now? Please?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: