Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | usrbinbash's commentslogin

Alright, do tell: Which subsets of the software development industry and which specific B2B tools, were "Killed" by generative AI?

Notion Mail, Mechanical Turk, Fiverr, Relay, a bunch of Salesforce, Upwork, Gitlab (~15% layoffs), Atlassian (lots of layoffs already - more product cuts coming), Stack Overflow, ...

And that's not counting AI companies "cannibalizing" their own products, like Sora video generation


Wow I had no idea Mechanical Turk closed. I assumed it would be quite valuable for doing a lot of data labelling type of work that percolates into AI models.

The labs have their users as the perfect training data source now. Much better than mechanial turk.

Notion mail specifically wasn't killed because it got replaced by AI in its niche, moreso that the company is shifting their resources.

Has Postman been killed?

It can be stopped by voters making smart decisions during elections.

Whether that happens, is up to the electorate.


This is...beautiful.


Sounds to me like not so much a problem with dentistry, but with a system where medical care is seen as a business first and foremost.

Elsewhere in the world, medical care is seen more like a basic human right or service a country needs to be able to provide to its citizens.


SO the point of this is ... what exactly?

A big arrow to an interface element which ... has a label that explains what it does?

So...a label for a label?


It seems silly but I think there's a good use case for this:

Helping people deal with bad UX.

Everybody who has worked in a traditional corporate environment has encountered poorly tutorialized, poorly labeled, counterintuitive user interfaces where the only way to know how to get something done is to have somebody sit over your shoulder and tell you which buttons to click.

Oh, you want to figure out which OIM entitlements your coworker has that you don't to debug an access issue? You just need to know that you have to click the "compliance" button to get there. Why is it called "compliance" when what it actually does is let you export comparisons from the user tables? Because fuck you that's why. Memorize it.

An AI assistant that can read the procedures for you, or sometimes even read the source code, or the website code, can show you how to accomplish something that the UI on its own fails to do.


Wait, I was under impression that UX was to be sorted out by AI just like the code is?


There are companies today that still keep Internet Explorer on their terminals because some of their intranet sites still need it in year of our lord 2026, you really think we're going to have 100% turnover of user interfaces within the next year just because AI makes the programming quicker?


I ran two experiments which require the `claude` CLI tool be installed.

For the first experiment, Claude stepped me through how to edit its settings.json to remove warnings from its configuration: a little clunky as I had to respond to Claude's CLI prompts to get it to auto run.

In the second experiment, Claude walked me through how to use Apple's Compressor.app to speed up a video. It walked me through dragging the file into compressor and clicking on the appropriate UI elements to do this.

So, one use case for the bigarrow skill enables Claude to step users through a relatively complex UI to accomplish a task.

There are likely more efficient ways to accomplish the tasks at hand (e.g. ffmpeg for the second experiment), but this use case is interesting if using a GUI tool is required.


It's so your agent can make a big arrow on the screen saying "click this, human" so that it can keep doing things


I love living in the future!


Finally we've built the reverse centaur from Cory Doctorow's classic novel "Don't Become the Reverse Centaur"


Glad you asked. Pointing my aging aunt to the right place on the screen to click without having to take control of her laptop, of course.



That would be a fine argument, if anyone had proof that invasive search practices actually made peoples lifes noticeably safer.

And yet, almost every single time such practices are implemented, nothing about actual safety changes...but a whole lot about surveillance does.

"People willing to trade their freedom for temporary security will lose both.

-- Benajmin Franklin, paraphrased


> That would be a fine argument, if anyone had proof that invasive search practices actually made peoples lifes noticeably safer.

El Salvador. Case closed.

"Mama! Poo-poo!"

— Adolf Hitler, as a toddler


> The advice for travelling to the US in my circles is

There's a much simpler advice:

"Don't."


Here's the thing:

People SHOULD be allowed to put their entire lives on phones if they want to.

People SHOULD NOT have to worry about governments using that against them.


I agree with both of those things! I'm just suggesting a precaution. People SHOULD be able to cross the road without getting run over, but we look both ways as a precaution. We shouldn't have to, but we do.


Oh great, another Jupyter-esque project...


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: