If we want more tax dollars, eliminate QSBS stacking that allows $750m in cap gains tax free, charge a tax on loans against assets like stocks, get rid of the carried interest loophole, end the step-up on assets distributed via inheritances, fix the corporate tax strategies that the NY Times documented https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/29/business/economy/offshore...
But even better, would be to fix the spending & fraud problems and implement Milei style reforms that stop government salaries for elected officials for deficit spending...
We ended up doing roughly the session-lock you're describing — pin a
conversation to whichever provider is already warm, reconsider only on a
cold prefix — and what surprised me is that eviction was rarely the thing
that broke it.
Any request that changed the prefix at all did: a tool
definition added mid-session, a system prompt carrying a timestamp,
retrieval that reorders context. Those all still look like a warm session
to the router and are a full re-price in practice.
So the lock ended up being less "stay until eviction" and more "stay until
something upstream invalidates the prefix" — and most of our savings came
from stopping our own code from invalidating it, not from the routing
decision.
If we want more tax dollars, eliminate QSBS stacking that allows $750m in cap gains tax free, charge a tax on loans against assets like stocks, get rid of the carried interest loophole, end the step-up on assets distributed via inheritances, fix the corporate tax strategies that the NY Times documented https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/29/business/economy/offshore...
But even better, would be to fix the spending & fraud problems and implement Milei style reforms that stop government salaries for elected officials for deficit spending...