Have noticed exactly this behavior as well, it's one of the better indicators actually the system ain't coming back.

How are you guys able to get any of these agentic loops to actually run to completion before you run out of usage for the week?

Smart model in charge, planning & orchestrating the dumb models doing the work.

Often dumb models from other plans & subscriptions. I like to choose whatever model is on sale on opencode-go.

YMMV drastically based on what the actual work is. Dumb models can't handle everything. And of course I have no idea how much of a backlog of work you're feeding it or anything. Some people have enough work to exceed any plan, and do the work inefficiently to boot.

Also, you can just buy as much usage as you want at API rates.

What a lame first comment. They're making tons of money. Sounds hard. Let's give up all our freedom.

A lot of people here work for Google. Tough to understand something when your salary depends on it.

Anyone find stuff like this funny? "They cracked a 15-bit key, OMG". 15 bits = 32,768 possible keys in the entire universe. A normal computer cracks this as well in 0.0000001 seconds.

This looks like the wallet lol - https://polyintel.io/trader/0x31a56e9e690c621ed21de08cb559e9...

Greed is always the undoing of such criminals.

If he'd stuck to $500 - $1000 bets, he could have stayed under the radar. And, over the period of his career, earned well north of $400k.

It would be hard not to when you can type in amounts and get instant feedback on what you would make. I imagine him sitting there, typing in $1000 and seeing $3000 payout. Then thinking "What if I just took my $32,000 savings and put it on this bet?". Type that in, see $400k and think "I can't not do this!"

Special forces in America are somewhat famous at this point for having side hustles.. Betting on themselves like this is at least better than being murderous drug dealers: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fort_Bragg_Cartel

Not that I am endorsing the behavior, but it is not a given how many high profile operations the soldier might glean in a time relevant manner. That might have been the one shot, one opportunity to hit big.

Absolutely retarded and absurdly overpriced for a tool that's basically fallen out of use. They're just trying to do anything they can to justify a crazy IPO valuation so they can keep pumping money into xAI.

Anyone think you'll actually be able to do anything on a Mac with only 8gb of RAM? I had a Macbook Pro before with 16gb of RAM and it was constantly running out of RAM and showing me the Force Quit Applications dialog. Constantly...

I am using a M1 Mac Mini 8GB as a home server/desktop, and it works just fine. It can run games and a Minecraft server in the background while serving video and home automation, and I've never had anything force quit because of it. I agree with the people who are saying 8GB should be kept as a target spec for the low end. It's really only bloated software that has made it necessary to get so much RAM, and now that prices have gone up, if Apple forces developers to do more with less for a segment of their market, I'm all for it.

I'm typing this on a 2012 MBP with 8Gb of RAM. That seemed like plenty when I bought it, and I did dev work in Xcode on the thing. Granted, it can only run Catalina, but it still gets the job done for what I use it for now. "Now" being web browser and running the Numbers/Pages/Keynote apps, which is about what anyone buying the Neo is going to do with it.

After 14 years of service, though, he'll get to retire soon, probably taking it easy running some version of Linux in his old age. Just as soon as that new M5 MBP (with 32Gb this time) shows up tomorrow.

There are millions of people using 8GB or RAM with MacOS without issue right now. I would bet 80% of all MacBooks in use right now have 16GB or less of RAM.

Wondering how it decided to show the force exit program dialog. I used to use 8g macbook for development. But instead warning on serious memory exhaustion, it just decided to lag and suicide with everything freezed (including the restart button).

People run million dollar businesses out of 8GB MacBooks.

Yeah just adding to this -- being able to see the files being operated on is absolutely essential for figuring out if you need to ^C it and try again or if you need to let it keep going.

Absolute idiots, who the hell is going to do a face scan? Or share their ID with ... Discord?

Seems like a great way to play games with moving money around. Come up with a "valuation" and then "acquire".

It worked for his Twitter co-investors. I guess they overlap enough with Xai investors for them to think it's more clever than it is a rip off.

I'm pretty amazed one can play a shell game for so long and so openly with the public.

Notify me when you launch the first private space company who can go on mars, or the first car company in the US in 100 years. Or build a top AI cluster in less than a month.

Well, wouldn't you be on board?

1. Does xAI seem more valuable than X?

2. Does SpaceX seem more valuable than xAI+X?

Not sure a lot of people would say "no" to either of these questions.

The only other question that I think is worth asking for investors, is how much stock in the acquiring company they get for their stocks in the acquired company. If the valuation of the acquired company in the deal is... optimistic enough, that seems like a no brainer.