AI writing code is a force multiplier and amplifies an orgs existing practices. In other words, if you lack structure and are a fan of chaos engineering, then that gets way worse. On the other hand, if you already have god workflows and an overall structure, it'll help you get things done more quickly.

Was expecting something more concrete with a set of deliverables that can actually be acted on.

This McKinsey? https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/justice-department-a...

A service account created in 1998 traces how sixty years of forgotten machine credentials became the foundation AI agents now inherit.

Twenty-six years ago, I landed in a country I'd never visited but somehow already knew. I thought the split existence I'd live, here and there simultaneously, was just the immigrant condition. Turns out, I was early to something much bigger!

Brilliant quote!

At the end of the 1960s, digital identity had a problem: to verify identity, the system must know the secret; but if the system knows the secret, the secret can be stolen.

If AI generates the content, trains on that content, then deploys agents to navigate that content on your behalf—at what point does your identity become whatever the model consensus decides you are?

Here's a fictional take on it, yet sadly based on real events: https://syntheticauth.ai/posts/synthetic-auth-the-power-prob...

Here's an entertaining take that flows with this topic: https://syntheticauth.ai/posts/synthetic-auth-the-power-prob...

>When reality writes better satire than satirists can invent, perhaps it's time to ask some harder questions.

Oof

more like: it's time to get torches and pitchforks