Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I always thought that hacking 4G (and/or 3G) was done by jamming the signal and thus forcing the phone to switch to older, already cracked protocol.


yes, that's how its done


So what makes 3G more resilient to downgrades than 4G?


I understand that 4G devices don't always use the 4G network for voice, they may either use 2 radios, or drop the 4G connection. The 4G network is used for data, and a 2G network for voice/SMS.

Eventually they will all start sending voice over the data link, but it isn't guaranteed.


As far as I know, none of the UK macro operators support Voice Over LTE yet, so yes, if you receive a phone call on 4G you get a paging message telling you to fall back to 2/3G circuit switched and answer the damn thing.

I'm assuming this is my stock S5 won't let me choose 4G only (calls become impossible), where as I can lock it to _just_ 3G.

I don't feel this fully addresses the original statement of "no 4G, hacked", though. If the downgrade-to-2G attack is the worry then 3G & 4G should be perfectly fine.

edit: grammar: supported->support.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: