I always hesitate to point this out, because I'm firmly in the 'we are stewards of this earth and we need to be a lot more responsible about that' camp - which the denialists are anything but. But essentially what you're looking for, at least for the 'this is a bad thing' part is chart 1-5:
i.e. AGW might be a not entirely bad thing, from the northern hemisphere's limited point of view at least, were it to be sufficiently finely calibrated to maintain the interglacial period indefinitely.(I suppose if the many worlds interpretation is correct, there's got to be at least one earth that gets lucky.)
However be aware, there is also a theory floating around that it might in fact trigger the next ice age, if it shuts down the global conveyor belt currents, in particular the gulf stream.
http://muller.lbl.gov/pages/IceAgeBook/history_of_climate.ht...
i.e. AGW might be a not entirely bad thing, from the northern hemisphere's limited point of view at least, were it to be sufficiently finely calibrated to maintain the interglacial period indefinitely.(I suppose if the many worlds interpretation is correct, there's got to be at least one earth that gets lucky.)
However be aware, there is also a theory floating around that it might in fact trigger the next ice age, if it shuts down the global conveyor belt currents, in particular the gulf stream.
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2004/05...
And that, as much as anything, is why it's called climate change, rather than global warming these days.