Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

There is pretty conclusive evidence that taller men are on average more attractive than shorter men. However being more attractive does not necessarily mean you will have more kids. My theory is that people want to marry people of similar attractiveness, so if for very attractive people the pool of potential matches could actually be smaller, in part because attractive people are more choosy. Also in terms of evolution, if you have sex it doesn't matter how attractive your partner was.


> Also in terms of evolution, if you have sex it doesn't matter how attractive your partner was.

It does, because your partner's attractiveness affects your child's attractiveness, and thereby their mating ability.


From the article: In fact, from a pure Darwinian perspective of fitter organisms producing more offspring, the opposite is happening with modern Homo sapiens. Impoverished, less healthy, and thus typically shorter families tend to have more children than prosperous families.

Everybody knows it, but it's pretty crazy when you think about it. However with a generally increasing standard of living that factor should still get smaller and smaller and the people thus taller and taller.


I think the confusion comes from defining what is a "fitter" organism?

and if we keep to trend, its quite likely we will bring Idiocracy[1] to fruition

[1] http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0387808/




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: