No, it's a very common issue brought up within the community that GHC takes a lot of time and memory.
That blog post just says that interpreting Haskell can be faster than compiling.
I worked with Haskell professionally on a pretty large codebase. It was split up into many separate libraries and binaries. There were a lot of coffee breaks when recompiling.
That blog post just says that interpreting Haskell can be faster than compiling.
I worked with Haskell professionally on a pretty large codebase. It was split up into many separate libraries and binaries. There were a lot of coffee breaks when recompiling.
https://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/45q90s/is_anything...