Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Right, the whole argument doesn't make sense. What should Docker do instead? Removing containers after they stopped so you have no idea what happened when it crashed? "Reuse" the container? Apparently somebody didn't grasp the concepts* and therefor considers all this BS.

*) Docker could maybe do better here, but tbh - I think documentation and getting the word out about how things work is one of the things Docker Inc does pretty ok.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: