Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You do realise even the founder of TDD doesn't back it anymore and code coverage is a very poor metric, your words sound like a senior developer from 2010. If he's a bad developer the best he can do is read up on SOLID principles and read a book like Clean Code with good examples of how to write code.


"You do realise even the founder of TDD doesn't back it anymore"

I ask this out of genuine curiosity but do you have a cite for this? Being fairly anti-TDD myself it'd be good to keep this factoid in my pocket.


That said, from the article it just sounds like he's worked for shitty companies that don't understand the value of not writing code twice


If you're referring to https://www.facebook.com/notes/kent-beck/rip-tdd/75084019494... he was being sarcastic.

But he also has said it can be over-done.

Which is not surprising, because everything that can be done can be over-done.


TDD is still a fine tool and the field hasn't moved on so much in 6 years that it's a stupid suggestion. It's a perfectly viable tool for helping to maintain output quality - like all other tools it might not work for everybody, or it might have to be applied carefully. But I wouldn't advise anyone to cargo cult the apostasy of a single proponent.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: