Why this uproar about the licence? It didn't change. That this licence is a bit strange and not really free was obvious from the beginning. People starting converting their projects now only because Apache told them the obvious are as weird as this licence.

ruby2js looks very interesting - hadn't spotted that before. Lighter than Opal but still provides the pleasure of writing in Ruby rather than JS.

https://github.com/rubys/ruby2js

What is it that makes fb value the license clause above react?