> The aim is communication. When the aim is very precise communication between knowledgeable parties, a technical language is reasonable. Expecting people to learn that language before they're allowed to have even a basic discussion is a recipe for existing in your own irrelevant bubble.
> It is human tendency to think that the things that you know should be known by everyone, and the things you don't know are probably not worth knowing.
You're over-interpreting what I said, and being not nice about it by assuming a hostile or superior stance on my part.
I didn't expect anyone to do anything. Parent stated that pseudo-English was better than IPA, and I disagreed. The end.
> It is human tendency to think that the things that you know should be known by everyone, and the things you don't know are probably not worth knowing.
You're over-interpreting what I said, and being not nice about it by assuming a hostile or superior stance on my part.
I didn't expect anyone to do anything. Parent stated that pseudo-English was better than IPA, and I disagreed. The end.