Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

To repeat myself: Even if the algorithm contains the intelligence to make the right decisions, humans have this annoying tendency to still want things like signatures or want people to appear in person barring legal rights to equal treatment for algorithms.

The algorithms might know to hire a lawfirm, but that just shifts the problem around a bit. What happens when the law firm wants a signature on engagement documents? Or needs a deposition? Trying to avoid even providing signatures will set off red flags from the outset. Banks deal with "know your customer" laws that makes them liable if they don't look into who they're dealing with. Lawyers and accounts and many others can get struck off or face legal sanctions as well.

As an example, my accountants does everything to do with my finances, no problems. I could easily script my interactions with them. Apart from one little detail: They regularly need me to sign stuff. Like my tax returns and those of my company. At which point said algorithm would need to commit fraud, or use the signature of a responsible human.

You might be able to eliminate some of these e.g. by hiring a board consisting of humans acting on behalf of a "reclusive" shareholder, but the problem is that you're then handing these people extensive power over the company with no real way of reigning them in if they uncover the truth.



Consider applying for YC's Winter 2027 batch! Applications are open till November 2.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: