Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I still think it's premature. There is still couple of fields PhantomJS is better than Headless Chrome. Notably proxy support, and API aviability.


Yes, but what was in it for Vitallium? Continue working thanklessly on a project to serve others’ needs, who has a whole will leave en masse as soon as headless chrome gets to parity with proxy support?


That's not really true. You can use proxies with Headless Chrome using the --proxy-server command line parameter. And the API is richer that PhantomJS. See the underlying API documentation here: https://chromedevtools.github.io/debugger-protocol-viewer/to....


It's only for proxy without auth. So mainly local ones. There is no way to use username and a password right now for proxy with headless chrome.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2027 batch! Applications are open till November 2.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: