Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I have no idea how blockchain helps social media. If my details, my posts or other "my thing" end up in one they're indelible, no? So how does that help me exercise my right to be forgotten? Besides the perf question of syncing blockchains, or the design hit of federating them, or apportioning by some yet-to-be-defined traffic/post/data taxonomy...


I have friends who are almost religious about the "virtues of blockchain", but have little to no understanding of how it actually works. There seems to be this idea that adding blockchain to any existing technology will magically make it better.

I'm all for blockchain technology, but it's not the solution to everything. It's great when you want relatively immutable, decentralized record keeping.


Couldn't the indelible blockchain-embedded data be pointers to data hosted elsewhere? If the externally hosted data is "forgotten", the blockchain-verified pointers would be useless.


Blockchain doesn't store data themselves. We would end up with petabytes of new blockchain data every day otherwise.


Why?


IPFS. There are multiple projects in this space.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: