Had experience with multiple ISP's pushing their own heavily marked-up and broken routers. I assume its a good money maker.
If only there was a slither of
corporate responsibility and associated punishment, probably a big ask from governments benefiting handsomely from the vulnerabilities despite the loss to the citizens they represent.
Guess it could be considered a new form of taxation? National security only really extends the physical domain.
I don't really think this is one of those cases unless I missed some trend recently where the govt is using misconfigured routers to access home networks... This is an overly scary article about running upnp on the wrong interface.
Sorry perhaps I don't understand your point, but the research in this article is entirely about governments and bad actors penetrating home networks for their own use.[1]
Are you suggesting private APT's exist? Seen no evidence so far that it's anyone but a dozen nations who lamely try to rebrand every now and then.
UPnP is a world of trouble in general, but even moreso for the average person disabling it in a house full of kids. There's needs to be responsibility taken by any large tech company pushing insecure products on their customers.
[1] researchers at Symantec had uncovered parts of this proxy network due to their ongoing investigation into the “Inception Framework,” and the APT group behind it.
If only there was a slither of corporate responsibility and associated punishment, probably a big ask from governments benefiting handsomely from the vulnerabilities despite the loss to the citizens they represent.
Guess it could be considered a new form of taxation? National security only really extends the physical domain.