Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Quite, and the first two paragraphs of the article, which are all I can read because I'm not a WSJ subscriber - which I suspect will be the case for many here - do nothing to dispel the sensationalist interpretation.

(As an aside I'm starting to opine that posting WSJ articles here may be bad form for this very reason.)



I've only been lurking a short while, but Ive been finding WSJ to be relatively unreliable.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: