Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I feel like this problem isn't specific to diamonds. The article mentions that big brand names (Tiffany etc.) are relatively unaffected and that is a pattern seen in many industries.

Skewed wealth distribution is creating demand for 'premium' products where prices far outstrip the practical value of such items. Everything else becomes commoditized as much as possible.



They are hurting. Tiffany’s value has been flat for 6 years, while the broader market is up 50%+.


That is the case for most stocks. 63% lose money. 35% make back the money the first 63% lost, and then the last 3% drive the insane gains.


Tiffany bought the "get large" story. Now it's common and sells to drug dealers and Paris Hilton lookalikes it's no better or worse than swarovski.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2027 batch! Applications are open till November 2.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: