Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Just because it's doing key-value pairs does not mean it's DNS. If I can't `dig` it, it's not DNS. This is simply doing HTTP redirects and works with no other protocols.


Hm, there are plenty of DNS records (not to mention all the custom ones all around the world) that you won't be able to `dig` but most people would still call DNS.


Can you provide an example of one that you can't 'dig'? I have my doubts.


One example: I can't seem to get dig to work with URI records (but I might be missing some flag). Doing `dig URI _kerberos.hasvickygoneonholiday.com` returns "no servers could be reached" while doing `kdig URI _kerberos.hasvickygoneonholiday.com` returns the proper records.

So seems to be a proper DNS record, but I can't make it work with dig.


Plain old "dig" works for me! I suspect it may be an older version of dig you're using? This is DiG 9.11.5-P4-5.1ubuntu2.1-Ubuntu on Ubuntu 19.10 ...


Strange, but thanks for letting me know! I'm on my Ubuntu laptop now, so `DiG 9.11.3-1ubuntu1.11-Ubuntu` and it works too! But initially tried on my Arch Linux desktop, where it didn't work, and I would expect my desktop to run a more recent version than my laptop. Very strange, will take another look.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2027 batch! Applications are open till November 2.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: