It seems simple enough for a binding arbitration clause to simply require the pl... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

anonymousab on April 7, 2020 | parent | context | favorite | on: A new weapon in arbitration: sheer volume

It seems simple enough for a binding arbitration clause to simply require the plaintiff to pay, and to tack on additional clauses to indemnify the corporate party.

Nextgrid on April 7, 2020 | [–]

I would assume that these scum companies would’ve already done so long ago if this was possible.

ClumsyPilot on April 7, 2020 | [–]

As much as they might dream of becoming legally invulnerable, I think even in US thats illegal.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact