You can stand by the phrasing, which I think most reasonable people would deem hyberbolic. It is a misuse of language to make such a strong emotional statement about a design decision where you have zero knowledge of the considerations involved, and what tradeoffs were considered.
There must be some sort of an internet rule one party intends a statement to be about the other, but it really applies to the author.
There must be some sort of an internet rule one party intends a statement to be about the other, but it really applies to the author.