Maybe a constructive message would be 'please post a summary at the top and a stronger conclusion at the bottom' since we're conditioned this way by various written structures.
I would argue that @OisinMoran followed this exact structure, the first section (above the fold) has this:
> Fundamentally the challenge is just correctly guessing what ID a given tweet is going to get, then appending that onto the URL for our profile and tweeting it.
And of course, the strong conclusion at the bottom is the Tweet itself.
