I feel like equally as many people rejected Pinker because it violated their priors.
I don't have a strong opinion one way or the other -- I guess my prior is that I am skeptical of broad narratives one way or the other and I think Pinker is prone to facile generalizations -- but most of the rebuttals I've seen to Pinker seem offended by the idea of progress, rather than taking his arguments seriously.
Too many folks gulped Pinker’s nonsense without further inspection because it suited their priors.