This seems sensible to me, so long as I’m allowed to use corporate personhood to tax a company’s income under this scheme.
If your money counts as speech because you have first amendment rights, then your income counts as income because you have IRS obligations.
I’m 100% over letting corporations pick some of the benefits of citizens but skate away from all the obligations. If you want the rights, you get the obligations. If you don’t want the obligations, you don’t get the rights.
If your money counts as speech because you have first amendment rights, then your income counts as income because you have IRS obligations.
I’m 100% over letting corporations pick some of the benefits of citizens but skate away from all the obligations. If you want the rights, you get the obligations. If you don’t want the obligations, you don’t get the rights.