Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The Times is known for much worse.

E.g., throughout 43's two terms, the stories were always whatever vice-43 or his enablers insisted was true, and never that vice-43 and his enablers were known to be lying when they said it. It is what got us mired in Iraq.

When a public figure expresses what is factually true or false, and is in fact false, it is actual news that they are doing that. That is the "lede": Public Official Openly Lying to Public. It is not surprising that they do, but it is still news when they do it, and in the public interest to get on record. What they are lying about is trivial except insofar as it reveals that they are trying to draw our attention away from something else.

Finding what that something else is would be a useful activity for a reporter.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: