Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That's what people generally expected when the whole P-core vs E-core on different microarchitectures design was announced. Instead of going for this, Intel went out of their way to state that there would be no AVX-512 even on P-cores and that's that. Ignoring this obvious solution is part of why I'm so flabbergasted at the situation.


Perhaps there are undisclosed security implications?


Then they can just say so and spin it as a PR win - "look how security conscious we are these days". Very publicly removing a formerly-headline feature with no explanation and then even failing at that is just mind boggling.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2027 batch! Applications are open till November 2.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: