Mine was a serious question about what, exactly “similar” is supposed to mean.
You are presuming to speak for @sqlite by claiming they did not mean felony, when the very example they provided of what it means to take it seriously is that it’s a crime.
What makes you certain that they weren’t suggesting exactly that?
I don’t think it’s fair to call my question a straw man. @sqlite has been making a strange moral argument out of git rebase for many years. I honestly want to understand where it’s coming from.
Fwiw I also don’t think it’s fair to ask a bullshit adhominem straw man question like “Are you actually unable to engage in a significant discussion without using strawmen?”
Stop what?? What are you talking about? Did you read @sqlite’s comment? “To alter that transaction after the fact is akin to felony fraud.” https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29133758 @SQLite literally said editing code history should be considered “akin to” a felony. It seems like you’re misunderstanding me because you’re misunderstanding @SQLite.
You are presuming to speak for @sqlite by claiming they did not mean felony, when the very example they provided of what it means to take it seriously is that it’s a crime.
What makes you certain that they weren’t suggesting exactly that?
I don’t think it’s fair to call my question a straw man. @sqlite has been making a strange moral argument out of git rebase for many years. I honestly want to understand where it’s coming from.
Fwiw I also don’t think it’s fair to ask a bullshit adhominem straw man question like “Are you actually unable to engage in a significant discussion without using strawmen?”