Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Distribution of Nano was more fair than bitcoin

yes, that's what all pre-miners say.

lightning network fees are negligible, you should try it one day.



Neglectible is not 0.

And I'm not a pre-miner


negligible is basically 0.

you're not a pre-miner (though maybe you are, how do i know?), nano "founders" are pre-mining scammers.


Nano is green, Bitcoin an environmental hazard :D.

But I'm sure we're not coming to an agreement :D.


No environmental hazard, it's a myth.

PoS is no greener than PoW, they are equally expensive. PoS is expensive in political plane (just like current financial system with all the corruption and wars) while Bitcoin is expensive purely in terms of energy. I know which one i prefer.


Why should an average user care that founders are premining "scammers"? An average user won't be a miner and an average user doesn't have an investment in any platform.

Someone saying x-crypto is a premining scam is somebody who invests in another platform and is advertising.


Because in PoS holders of large amount of assets are also political elite that gets to make the rules.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2027 batch! Applications are open till November 2.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: