> All this talk about Web3 and I still don't know what it is.
> People compare the Internet to web3, but it is a false comparison. All of the above questions could be answered by the Internet
Imagine that today is 1994. Now replace the word web3 in tour first paragraph with the word "internet", and read it again, as a person living in 1994. How many critical human needs was it meeting, and how many grannies were using it then?
(As an aside, how many critical human needs are satisfied by video gaming? Why does a tech phenomenon need to satisfy a critical human need to be viable and interesting?)
But it's not a specific crypto project. It is a paradigm within which various different services are being built. Comparing "web3" (whatever it's supposed to mean) with Juicero or even with Google, for that matter, makes no sense. You could compare "web3" with "software as a service", I suppose. Or with "containerization", or "devops".
(Although my original point wasn't about predicting internet-like success for web3; but just saying that the criticism based on the number of grannies using a certain new technology, or the number of people it is lifting out of poverty at any given moment, is misguided; we are still at a very early adoption stage, which may or may not go anywhere.)
> People compare the Internet to web3, but it is a false comparison. All of the above questions could be answered by the Internet
Imagine that today is 1994. Now replace the word web3 in tour first paragraph with the word "internet", and read it again, as a person living in 1994. How many critical human needs was it meeting, and how many grannies were using it then?
(As an aside, how many critical human needs are satisfied by video gaming? Why does a tech phenomenon need to satisfy a critical human need to be viable and interesting?)