Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I don’t believe he erred for the sake of erring (I don’t think anyone does, finally), but I do think his errors were transparent at the time. See, for example, the refutation in Suarez’ Against the Errors of the Anglican Sect, Book II.


Fascinating though this looks I don't have the semester+ required to study it properly.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: