Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin
Why Jobs is no Edison (american.com)
17 points by hammock on Oct 4, 2011 | hide | past | favorite | 17 comments


This is a response to another article that made the comparison. Given that neither Apple nor Jobs have suggested Jobs is an Edison, and given that I haven’t heard anyone calling Jobs an Edison outside of the article this author cites, I’d call this “Feeding a troll.”

Sure, one person called Jobs an Edison, but it doesn’t feel particularly worthy of a reply, much less of a spot on the HN front page.


[deleted]


I was not aware that potential professors are carefully screened for troll-like qualities before being given the position.


Apple II would have been impossible without innovations by Xerox’s PARC

Minor quibble; the author is probably talking about the Mac -- not the Apple II, which predates the PARC visit by at least two years.


Even more minor quibble: the parent comment is probably talking about the Lisa which predated the Mac by more than two years.


Both men led organizations that took the "raw materials" of their generation and created end-to-end solutions that very quickly dominated the market.

In Edison's time the interesting innovations were happening at the first-order level. Now most of the interesting innovations are happening higher up the technological food chain.


That's not what the "Entrepenurial Walk of Fame" sitting in front of the Kendall Square Marriott says.

http://boston.tumblr.com/post/10274370791


As far as I know Jobs hasn't publicly electrocuted animals in an attempt to scare consumers away from competing products. Yep. Clearly no Edison.


Steve Jobs became big by being right most of the time. Edison became big by being a bully with questionable business practices. DC vs AC anyone?

If there is one person you could compare Jobs to, this would be Henri Ford, who's vision also combined existing technologies into something new, brilliant, making something simpler, more useful and more accessible for the large public.


My mother in law (in 80s) says: "iPhone and iPads will not get us out of the recession". That sums things up.


More like, Why Jobs is no Tesla, Edison took credit for the work of others.


But Jobs took credit for the work of others(Wozniak) too.


No he did not. He always talked about "we at apple", and always gave credit to the engineering and designer teams.

The story of Wozniak and Jobs is widely known, Jobs described Wozniak on more than one occasion as a brilliant engineer and that without him, Apple would not have existed.


To clarify, I was agreeing that Tesla was beyond them all. :)

The area where Jobs has done what no one else has -- made technology into art we love to buy, use and enjoy, and opened the world up to connecting, sharing and creating, is in the same spirit of what Tesla brought into the world with his innovations with electricity.

I think we can agree that Electricity is a little more fundamental to day-to-day raising the quality of more people's lives in this world than a phone, computer, or ipad. It might be less and less each day, but I still think electricity can transform everyone's life.


So Jobs is idea/credit snatcher Edison, and Tesla owns them all. I can agree with this.

The one things Jobs has done that no one has is changed how the masses use technology in such a short period of time. I don't think many fall into that category.


The difference though is people love their iPods and macs but rarely think about electricity and the lightbulb.


Edison is no Tesla !!!

I believe he has no idea about War of Currents and who won it.


That's right, Steve's no Edison. Steve's better than Edison.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: