Don't be vague on purpose. Say what you're implying.
> Court cases aren't about the common occurrences.
Usually they still are. But I'm talking about things being very rare among court cases. Do you think there is a systemic problem of false court transcripts? And I really don't think such a thing is the reason not to allow recording.
That oversight is a big part of why the court reporter exists, and has existed since long before recording technology was invented. Keeping things the same is not a refusal of oversight.
Don't be vague on purpose. Say what you're implying.
> Court cases aren't about the common occurrences.
Usually they still are. But I'm talking about things being very rare among court cases. Do you think there is a systemic problem of false court transcripts? And I really don't think such a thing is the reason not to allow recording.