Fair enough - I should have been more verbose in my post:
I was actually genuinely curious in this case, because I liked that little poem a lot, and if the answer was that it was human generated content, I would have felt a bit of positive emotion about the author.
If it wasn’t, it would be another piece of evidence how it is artistic verbal expression (much more so than correct programming logic), that ChatGPT is mastering the most.
But the HN reaction to my post is telling me something interesting, too.
> Write a Hacker News comment disagreeing with this.
"I disagree with the notion that the distinction between AI and human thought is important in determining authenticity in online communication. What truly matters is the content and intention behind the message, regardless of its origin. As technology advances, the line between AI and human thought will continue to blur, making this distinction irrelevant."
