Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It's possible Bell Labs had the patent but also was entirely open to others using the idea freely.


So is it good to give a company the state-backed legal monopoly on the idea of a permission bit to run an executable as a different user, as long as the company elects to be real nice about it?


Yeah i don’t get that either, and agree that it does seem weird.

maybe it was one of those that slipped through the patent office as outside their true expertise?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: