Why not? That seems to be lacking imagination. There's all sorts of regulation that can be brought to bear.
> Yeah, because ChatGPT doesn't exhibit human behaviors, at all.
You can think so, but others disagree. Here is where the thread started.
> The more I work with LLMs, the more I think of them as plagiarization engines. > We're all kind of plagiariztion engines.
If you don't see any similarities others see, then further discussion is fruitless.
> ChatGPT doesn't exhibit human behaviors, at all.
Chat is a behavior humans do. It chats, and pretty damn well. Clearly you mean something else then what you are explicitly saying.
Why not? That seems to be lacking imagination. There's all sorts of regulation that can be brought to bear.
> Yeah, because ChatGPT doesn't exhibit human behaviors, at all.
You can think so, but others disagree. Here is where the thread started.
> The more I work with LLMs, the more I think of them as plagiarization engines. > We're all kind of plagiariztion engines.
If you don't see any similarities others see, then further discussion is fruitless.
> ChatGPT doesn't exhibit human behaviors, at all.
Chat is a behavior humans do. It chats, and pretty damn well. Clearly you mean something else then what you are explicitly saying.